ladybird/Kernel/Storage/ATA/GenericIDE/Channel.cpp

336 lines
12 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (c) 2018-2021, Andreas Kling <kling@serenityos.org>
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
*/
#include <AK/ByteBuffer.h>
#include <AK/Singleton.h>
#include <AK/StringView.h>
#include <Kernel/Arch/Delay.h>
#include <Kernel/Bus/PCI/API.h>
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
#include <Kernel/IOWindow.h>
#include <Kernel/Memory/MemoryManager.h>
#include <Kernel/Process.h>
#include <Kernel/Sections.h>
#include <Kernel/Storage/ATA/ATADiskDevice.h>
#include <Kernel/Storage/ATA/Definitions.h>
#include <Kernel/Storage/ATA/GenericIDE/Channel.h>
#include <Kernel/Storage/ATA/GenericIDE/Controller.h>
#include <Kernel/WorkQueue.h>
namespace Kernel {
#define PATA_PRIMARY_IRQ 14
#define PATA_SECONDARY_IRQ 15
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
UNMAP_AFTER_INIT NonnullLockRefPtr<IDEChannel> IDEChannel::create(IDEController const& controller, IOWindowGroup io_window_group, ChannelType type)
{
auto ata_identify_data_buffer = KBuffer::try_create_with_size("ATA Identify Page"sv, 4096, Memory::Region::Access::ReadWrite, AllocationStrategy::AllocateNow).release_value();
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
return adopt_lock_ref(*new IDEChannel(controller, move(io_window_group), type, move(ata_identify_data_buffer)));
}
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
UNMAP_AFTER_INIT NonnullLockRefPtr<IDEChannel> IDEChannel::create(IDEController const& controller, u8 irq, IOWindowGroup io_window_group, ChannelType type)
{
auto ata_identify_data_buffer = KBuffer::try_create_with_size("ATA Identify Page"sv, 4096, Memory::Region::Access::ReadWrite, AllocationStrategy::AllocateNow).release_value();
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
return adopt_lock_ref(*new IDEChannel(controller, irq, move(io_window_group), type, move(ata_identify_data_buffer)));
}
StringView IDEChannel::channel_type_string() const
{
if (m_channel_type == ChannelType::Primary)
return "Primary"sv;
return "Secondary"sv;
}
bool IDEChannel::select_device_and_wait_until_not_busy(DeviceType device_type, size_t milliseconds_timeout)
{
microseconds_delay(20);
u8 slave = device_type == DeviceType::Slave;
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_HDDEVSEL, 0xA0 | (slave << 4)); // First, we need to select the drive itself
microseconds_delay(20);
size_t time_elapsed = 0;
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
while (m_io_window_group.control_window().read8(0) & ATA_SR_BSY && time_elapsed <= milliseconds_timeout) {
microseconds_delay(1000);
time_elapsed++;
}
return time_elapsed <= milliseconds_timeout;
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::port_phy_reset()
{
MutexLocker locker(m_lock);
SpinlockLocker hard_locker(m_hard_lock);
// reset the channel
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
u8 device_control = m_io_window_group.control_window().read8(0);
// Wait 30 milliseconds
microseconds_delay(30000);
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.control_window().write8(0, device_control | (1 << 2));
// Wait 30 milliseconds
microseconds_delay(30000);
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.control_window().write8(0, device_control);
// Wait up to 30 seconds before failing
if (!select_device_and_wait_until_not_busy(DeviceType::Master, 30000)) {
dbgln("IDEChannel: reset failed, busy flag on master stuck");
return Error::from_errno(EBUSY);
}
// Wait up to 30 seconds before failing
if (!select_device_and_wait_until_not_busy(DeviceType::Slave, 30000)) {
dbgln("IDEChannel: reset failed, busy flag on slave stuck");
return Error::from_errno(EBUSY);
}
return {};
}
#if ARCH(I386) || ARCH(X86_64)
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::allocate_resources_for_pci_ide_controller(Badge<PCIIDELegacyModeController>, bool force_pio)
{
return allocate_resources(force_pio);
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::allocate_resources_for_isa_ide_controller(Badge<ISAIDEController>)
{
return allocate_resources(true);
}
#endif
UNMAP_AFTER_INIT ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::allocate_resources(bool force_pio)
{
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
dbgln_if(PATA_DEBUG, "IDEChannel: {} IO base: {}", channel_type_string(), m_io_window_group.io_window());
dbgln_if(PATA_DEBUG, "IDEChannel: {} control base: {}", channel_type_string(), m_io_window_group.control_window());
if (m_io_window_group.bus_master_window())
dbgln_if(PATA_DEBUG, "IDEChannel: {} bus master base: {}", channel_type_string(), m_io_window_group.bus_master_window());
else
dbgln_if(PATA_DEBUG, "IDEChannel: {} bus master base disabled", channel_type_string());
if (!force_pio) {
m_dma_enabled = true;
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
VERIFY(m_io_window_group.bus_master_window());
// Let's try to set up DMA transfers.
m_prdt_region = TRY(MM.allocate_dma_buffer_page("IDE PRDT"sv, Memory::Region::Access::ReadWrite, m_prdt_page));
VERIFY(!m_prdt_page.is_null());
m_dma_buffer_region = TRY(MM.allocate_dma_buffer_page("IDE DMA region"sv, Memory::Region::Access::ReadWrite, m_dma_buffer_page));
VERIFY(!m_dma_buffer_page.is_null());
prdt().end_of_table = 0x8000;
// clear bus master interrupt status
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->write8(2, m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->read8(2) | 4);
}
return {};
}
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
UNMAP_AFTER_INIT IDEChannel::IDEChannel(IDEController const& controller, u8 irq, IOWindowGroup io_group, ChannelType type, NonnullOwnPtr<KBuffer> ata_identify_data_buffer)
: ATAPort(controller, (type == ChannelType::Primary ? 0 : 1), move(ata_identify_data_buffer))
, IRQHandler(irq)
, m_channel_type(type)
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
, m_io_window_group(move(io_group))
{
}
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
UNMAP_AFTER_INIT IDEChannel::IDEChannel(IDEController const& controller, IOWindowGroup io_group, ChannelType type, NonnullOwnPtr<KBuffer> ata_identify_data_buffer)
: ATAPort(controller, (type == ChannelType::Primary ? 0 : 1), move(ata_identify_data_buffer))
, IRQHandler(type == ChannelType::Primary ? PATA_PRIMARY_IRQ : PATA_SECONDARY_IRQ)
, m_channel_type(type)
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
, m_io_window_group(move(io_group))
{
}
UNMAP_AFTER_INIT IDEChannel::~IDEChannel() = default;
bool IDEChannel::handle_irq(RegisterState const&)
{
auto result = handle_interrupt_after_dma_transaction();
// FIXME: Propagate errors properly
VERIFY(!result.is_error());
return result.release_value();
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::stop_busmastering()
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
VERIFY(m_io_window_group.bus_master_window());
m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->write8(0, 0);
return {};
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::start_busmastering(TransactionDirection direction)
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
VERIFY(m_io_window_group.bus_master_window());
m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->write8(0, (direction != TransactionDirection::Write ? 0x9 : 0x1));
return {};
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::force_busmastering_status_clean()
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
VERIFY(m_io_window_group.bus_master_window());
m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->write8(2, m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->read8(2) | 4);
return {};
}
ErrorOr<u8> IDEChannel::busmastering_status()
{
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
VERIFY(m_io_window_group.bus_master_window());
return m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->read8(2);
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::prepare_transaction_with_busmastering(TransactionDirection direction, PhysicalAddress prdt_buffer)
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->write32(4, prdt_buffer.get());
m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->write8(0, direction != TransactionDirection::Write ? 0x8 : 0);
// Turn on "Interrupt" and "Error" flag. The error flag should be cleared by hardware.
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->write8(2, m_io_window_group.bus_master_window()->read8(2) | 0x6);
return {};
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::initiate_transaction(TransactionDirection)
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
return {};
}
ErrorOr<u8> IDEChannel::task_file_status()
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
return m_io_window_group.control_window().read8(0);
}
ErrorOr<u8> IDEChannel::task_file_error()
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
return m_io_window_group.io_window().read8(ATA_REG_ERROR);
}
ErrorOr<bool> IDEChannel::detect_presence_on_selected_device()
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_SECCOUNT0, 0x55);
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_LBA0, 0xAA);
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_SECCOUNT0, 0xAA);
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_LBA0, 0x55);
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_SECCOUNT0, 0x55);
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_LBA0, 0xAA);
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
auto nsectors_value = m_io_window_group.io_window().read8(ATA_REG_SECCOUNT0);
auto lba0 = m_io_window_group.io_window().read8(ATA_REG_LBA0);
if (lba0 == 0xAA && nsectors_value == 0x55)
return true;
return false;
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::wait_if_busy_until_timeout(size_t timeout_in_milliseconds)
{
size_t time_elapsed = 0;
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
while (m_io_window_group.control_window().read8(0) & ATA_SR_BSY && time_elapsed <= timeout_in_milliseconds) {
microseconds_delay(1000);
time_elapsed++;
}
if (time_elapsed <= timeout_in_milliseconds)
return {};
return Error::from_errno(EBUSY);
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::force_clear_interrupts()
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.io_window().read8(ATA_REG_STATUS);
return {};
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::load_taskfile_into_registers(ATAPort::TaskFile const& task_file, LBAMode lba_mode, size_t completion_timeout_in_milliseconds)
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
VERIFY(m_hard_lock.is_locked());
u8 head = 0;
if (lba_mode == LBAMode::FortyEightBit) {
head = 0;
} else if (lba_mode == LBAMode::TwentyEightBit) {
head = (task_file.lba_high[0] & 0x0F);
}
// Note: Preserve the selected drive, always use LBA addressing
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
auto driver_register = ((m_io_window_group.io_window().read8(ATA_REG_HDDEVSEL) & (1 << 4)) | (head | (1 << 5) | (1 << 6)));
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_HDDEVSEL, driver_register);
microseconds_delay(50);
if (lba_mode == LBAMode::FortyEightBit) {
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_SECCOUNT1, (task_file.count >> 8) & 0xFF);
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_LBA3, task_file.lba_high[0]);
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_LBA4, task_file.lba_high[1]);
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_LBA5, task_file.lba_high[2]);
}
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_SECCOUNT0, task_file.count & 0xFF);
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_LBA0, task_file.lba_low[0]);
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_LBA1, task_file.lba_low[1]);
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_LBA2, task_file.lba_low[2]);
// FIXME: Set a timeout here?
size_t time_elapsed = 0;
for (;;) {
if (time_elapsed > completion_timeout_in_milliseconds)
return Error::from_errno(EBUSY);
// FIXME: Use task_file_status method
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
auto status = m_io_window_group.control_window().read8(0);
if (!(status & ATA_SR_BSY) && (status & ATA_SR_DRDY))
break;
microseconds_delay(1000);
time_elapsed++;
}
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_COMMAND, task_file.command);
return {};
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::device_select(size_t device_index)
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
if (device_index > 1)
return Error::from_errno(EINVAL);
microseconds_delay(20);
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.io_window().write8(ATA_REG_HDDEVSEL, (0xA0 | ((device_index) << 4)));
microseconds_delay(20);
return {};
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::enable_interrupts()
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.control_window().write8(0, 0);
m_interrupts_enabled = true;
return {};
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::disable_interrupts()
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.control_window().write8(0, 1 << 1);
m_interrupts_enabled = false;
return {};
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::read_pio_data_to_buffer(UserOrKernelBuffer& buffer, size_t block_offset, size_t words_count)
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
VERIFY(words_count == 256);
for (u32 i = 0; i < 256; ++i) {
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
u16 data = m_io_window_group.io_window().read16(ATA_REG_DATA);
// FIXME: Don't assume 512 bytes sector
TRY(buffer.write(&data, block_offset * 512 + (i * 2), 2));
}
return {};
}
ErrorOr<void> IDEChannel::write_pio_data_from_buffer(UserOrKernelBuffer const& buffer, size_t block_offset, size_t words_count)
{
VERIFY(m_lock.is_locked());
VERIFY(words_count == 256);
for (u32 i = 0; i < 256; ++i) {
u16 buf;
// FIXME: Don't assume 512 bytes sector
TRY(buffer.read(&buf, block_offset * 512 + (i * 2), 2));
Kernel: Introduce the IOWindow class This class is intended to replace all IOAddress usages in the Kernel codebase altogether. The idea is to ensure IO can be done in arch-specific manner that is determined mostly in compile-time, but to still be able to use most of the Kernel code in non-x86 builds. Specific devices that rely on x86-specific IO instructions are already placed in the Arch/x86 directory and are omitted for non-x86 builds. The reason this works so well is the fact that x86 IO space acts in a similar fashion to the traditional memory space being available in most CPU architectures - the x86 IO space is essentially just an array of bytes like the physical memory address space, but requires x86 IO instructions to load and store data. Therefore, many devices allow host software to interact with the hardware registers in both ways, with a noticeable trend even in the modern x86 hardware to move away from the old x86 IO space to exclusively using memory-mapped IO. Therefore, the IOWindow class encapsulates both methods for x86 builds. The idea is to allow PCI devices to be used in either way in x86 builds, so when trying to map an IOWindow on a PCI BAR, the Kernel will try to find the proper method being declared with the PCI BAR flags. For old PCI hardware on non-x86 builds this might turn into a problem as we can't use port mapped IO, so the Kernel will gracefully fail with ENOTSUP error code if that's the case, as there's really nothing we can do within such case. For general IO, the read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} methods are available as a convenient API for other places in the Kernel. There are simply no direct 64-bit IO API methods yet, as it's not needed right now and is not considered to be Arch-agnostic too - the x86 IO space doesn't support generating 64 bit cycle on IO bus and instead requires two 2 32-bit accesses. If for whatever reason it appears to be necessary to do IO in such manner, it could probably be added with some neat tricks to do so. It is recommended to use Memory::TypedMapping struct if direct 64 bit IO is actually needed.
2022-09-23 05:50:04 -03:00
m_io_window_group.io_window().write16(ATA_REG_DATA, buf);
}
return {};
}
}