dmaax/ladybird
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
ladybird/Userland/Libraries/LibWeb/Layout/BlockContainer.cpp

35 lines
890 B
C++
Raw Normal View History

Meta: Add license header to source files As suggested by Joshua, this commit adds the 2-clause BSD license as a comment block to the top of every source file. For the first pass, I've just added myself for simplicity. I encourage everyone to add themselves as copyright holders of any file they've added or modified in some significant way. If I've added myself in error somewhere, feel free to replace it with the appropriate copyright holder instead. Going forward, all new source files should include a license header.
2020-01-18 05:38:21 -03:00
/*
LibWeb: Add Painting::Box and move things from Layout::Box into it The "paintable" state in Layout::Box was actually not safe to access until after layout had been performed. As a first step towards making this harder to mess up accidentally, this patch moves painting information from Layout::Box to a new class: Painting::Box. Every layout can have a corresponding paint box, and it holds the final used metrics determined by layout. The paint box is created and populated by FormattingState::commit(). I've also added DOM::Node::paint_box() as a convenient way to access the paint box (if available) of a given DOM node. Going forward, I believe this will allow us to better separate data that belongs to layout vs painting, and also open up opportunities for naturally invalidating caches in the paint box (since it's reconstituted by every layout.)
2022-03-09 19:53:41 -03:00
* Copyright (c) 2018-2022, Andreas Kling <kling@serenityos.org>
Meta: Add license header to source files As suggested by Joshua, this commit adds the 2-clause BSD license as a comment block to the top of every source file. For the first pass, I've just added myself for simplicity. I encourage everyone to add themselves as copyright holders of any file they've added or modified in some significant way. If I've added myself in error somewhere, feel free to replace it with the appropriate copyright holder instead. Going forward, all new source files should include a license header.
2020-01-18 05:38:21 -03:00
*
Everything: Move to SPDX license identifiers in all files. SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized way of representing file license information. See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool. ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
2021-04-22 05:24:48 -03:00
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
Meta: Add license header to source files As suggested by Joshua, this commit adds the 2-clause BSD license as a comment block to the top of every source file. For the first pass, I've just added myself for simplicity. I encourage everyone to add themselves as copyright holders of any file they've added or modified in some significant way. If I've added myself in error somewhere, feel free to replace it with the appropriate copyright holder instead. Going forward, all new source files should include a license header.
2020-01-18 05:38:21 -03:00
*/
LibWeb: Rename Layout::BlockBox => BlockContainer There's a subtle difference here. A "block box" in the spec is a block-level box, while a "block container" is a box whose children are either all inline-level boxes in an IFC, or all block-level boxes participating in a BFC. Notably, an "inline-block" box is a "block container" but not a "block box" since it is itself inline-level.
2021-10-06 15:02:41 -03:00
#include <LibWeb/Layout/BlockContainer.h>
LibWeb: Move PaintingBox to its own .cpp and .h files
2022-03-10 19:13:37 -03:00
#include <LibWeb/Painting/PaintableBox.h>
LibHTML: Start fleshing out a basic layout tree.
2019-06-15 17:49:44 -03:00
LibWeb: Rename LayoutNode classes and move them into Layout namespace Bring the names of various boxes closer to spec language. This should hopefully make things easier to understand and hack on. :^) Some notable changes: - LayoutNode -> Layout::Node - LayoutBox -> Layout::Box - LayoutBlock -> Layout::BlockBox - LayoutReplaced -> Layout::ReplacedBox - LayoutDocument -> Layout::InitialContainingBlockBox - LayoutText -> Layout::TextNode - LayoutInline -> Layout::InlineNode Note that this is not strictly a "box tree" as we also hang inline/text nodes in the same tree, and they don't generate boxes. (Instead, they contribute line box fragments to their containing block!)
2020-11-22 11:53:01 -03:00
namespace Web::Layout {
LibWeb: Move everything into the Web namespace
2020-03-07 06:27:02 -03:00
LibWeb: Rename Layout::BlockBox => BlockContainer There's a subtle difference here. A "block box" in the spec is a block-level box, while a "block container" is a box whose children are either all inline-level boxes in an IFC, or all block-level boxes participating in a BFC. Notably, an "inline-block" box is a "block container" but not a "block box" since it is itself inline-level.
2021-10-06 15:02:41 -03:00
BlockContainer::BlockContainer(DOM::Document& document, DOM::Node* node, NonnullRefPtr<CSS::StyleProperties> style)
LibWeb: Rename LayoutNode classes and move them into Layout namespace Bring the names of various boxes closer to spec language. This should hopefully make things easier to understand and hack on. :^) Some notable changes: - LayoutNode -> Layout::Node - LayoutBox -> Layout::Box - LayoutBlock -> Layout::BlockBox - LayoutReplaced -> Layout::ReplacedBox - LayoutDocument -> Layout::InitialContainingBlockBox - LayoutText -> Layout::TextNode - LayoutInline -> Layout::InlineNode Note that this is not strictly a "box tree" as we also hang inline/text nodes in the same tree, and they don't generate boxes. (Instead, they contribute line box fragments to their containing block!)
2020-11-22 11:53:01 -03:00
: Box(document, node, move(style))
LibHTML: Start fleshing out a basic layout tree.
2019-06-15 17:49:44 -03:00
{
}
LibWeb: Rename Layout::BlockBox => BlockContainer There's a subtle difference here. A "block box" in the spec is a block-level box, while a "block container" is a box whose children are either all inline-level boxes in an IFC, or all block-level boxes participating in a BFC. Notably, an "inline-block" box is a "block container" but not a "block box" since it is itself inline-level.
2021-10-06 15:02:41 -03:00
BlockContainer::BlockContainer(DOM::Document& document, DOM::Node* node, CSS::ComputedValues computed_values)
LibWeb: Remove specified style from layout nodes Layout nodes now only carry CSS computer values with them. The main idea here is to give them only what they need to perform layout, and leave the rest back in the DOM.
2021-01-06 10:10:53 -03:00
: Box(document, node, move(computed_values))
{
}
Libraries: Use default constructors/destructors in LibWeb https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#cother-other-default-operation-rules "The compiler is more likely to get the default semantics right and you cannot implement these functions better than the compiler."
2022-03-14 16:21:51 -03:00
BlockContainer::~BlockContainer() = default;
LibHTML: Add layout() overrides for LayoutText and LayoutBlock.
2019-06-20 18:00:26 -03:00
LibWeb: Rename Painting::Box => Paintable Calling this "Box" made it very confusing to look at code that used both Layout::Box and Painting::Box. Let's try calling it Paintable instead.
2022-03-10 07:26:01 -03:00
Painting::PaintableWithLines const* BlockContainer::paint_box() const
LibWeb: Make Painting::Box virtual and add Painting::BoxWithLines BlockContainer paint boxes are the only ones that have line boxes associated, so let's not waste memory on line boxes in all the other types of boxes. This also adds Layout::Box::paint_box() and the more tightly typed Layout::BlockContainer::paint_box() to get at the paint box from the corresponding layout box.
2022-03-10 07:12:06 -03:00
{
LibWeb/Layout: Rename Box::{paint => paintable}_box() It returns a PaintableBox, not a 'PaintBox'.
2023-04-20 12:00:42 -03:00
return static_cast<Painting::PaintableWithLines const*>(Box::paintable_box());
LibWeb: Make Painting::Box virtual and add Painting::BoxWithLines BlockContainer paint boxes are the only ones that have line boxes associated, so let's not waste memory on line boxes in all the other types of boxes. This also adds Layout::Box::paint_box() and the more tightly typed Layout::BlockContainer::paint_box() to get at the paint box from the corresponding layout box.
2022-03-10 07:12:06 -03:00
}
LibWeb: Make the paint tree GC-allocated This simplifies the ownership model between DOM/layout/paint nodes immensely by deferring to the garbage collector for figuring out what's live and what's not.
2023-01-11 08:51:49 -03:00
JS::GCPtr<Painting::Paintable> BlockContainer::create_paintable() const
LibWeb: Let Paintable perform the painting This patch adds a bunch of Paintable subclasses, each corresponding to the Layout::Node subclasses that had a paint() override. All painting logic is moved from layout nodes into their corresponding paintables. Paintables are now created by asking a Layout::Box to produce one: static NonnullOwnPtr<Paintable> Layout::Box::create_paintable() Note that inline nodes still have their painting logic. Since they are not boxes, and all paintables have a corresponding box, we'll need to come up with some other solution for them.
2022-03-10 10:02:25 -03:00
{
return Painting::PaintableWithLines::create(*this);
}
LibWeb: Move everything into the Web namespace
2020-03-07 06:27:02 -03:00
}
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink