The Paintable tree and its supplemental painting data structures were
GC allocated because that was the easiest way to manage it and avoid
leaks introduced by ref cycles. This included the Paintable subclasses
themselves plus StackingContext, ChromeWidget, Scrollbar, ResizeHandle,
and scroll-frame state.
We are now trying to reduce GC allocation churn on layout and painting
updates, so keeping this short-lived rendering tree outside the JS heap
is a better fit. Move Paintable to RefCountedTreeNode, make painting
helpers ref-counted or weakly reference Paintables, and update the
layout and event-handler call sites to use RefPtr/WeakPtr ownership.
We were conflating elements being the active element and elements being
activated. The :active pseudo class is supposed to be based on whether
an element will have its activation behavior run upon a button being
released.
Store whether an element is being activated as a flag that is set/reset
by EventHandler.
Doing this allows label elements to visually activate their control
without doing a weird paintable hack, so the Labelable classes have
been yeeted.
PaintContext dates back to a time when display lists didn't exist and it
truly represented "paint context". Renaming it to better align with its
current role.
This reduces the number of `.cpp` files that need to be recompiled when
one of the below header files changes as follows:
Painting/Command.h: 1030 -> 61
Painting/DisplayList.h: 1030 -> 60
Painting/DisplayListRecorder.h: 557 -> 59
Resulting in a massive rename across almost everywhere! Alongside the
namespace change, we now have the following names:
* JS::NonnullGCPtr -> GC::Ref
* JS::GCPtr -> GC::Ptr
* JS::HeapFunction -> GC::Function
* JS::CellImpl -> GC::Cell
* JS::Handle -> GC::Root
Now that the heap has no knowledge about a JavaScript realm and is
purely for managing the memory of the heap, it does not make sense
to name this function to say that it is a non-realm variant.
