We currently have two ongoing implementations of RFC 9111, HTTP caching.
In order to consolidate these, this patch moves the implementation from
RequestServer to LibHTTP for re-use within LibWeb.
The Win32 API equivalent to pipe2() is CreatePipe(), which creates read
and write anonymous pipe handles that we can set to non-blocking via
SetNamedPipeHandleState(); however, this initial approach caused issues
as our Windows infrastructure assumes socket-based handles/fds and that
we don't use Windows pipes at all, see Core::System::is_socket() in
SystemWindows.cpp. So we use socketpair() to keep our current
assumptions true.
Given that Windows uses socketpair() and Unix uses pipe2(), this
RequestPipe abstraction avoids ifdef soup by hiding the details about
how the read/write fds pair is created and how response data is written
to the client.
We currently manage request lifetime as both an ActiveRequest structure
and a series of lambda callbacks. In an upcoming patch, we will want to
"pause" a request to de-duplicate equivalent requests, such that only
one request goes over the network and saves its response to the disk
cache.
To make that easier to reason about, this adds a Request class to manage
the lifetime of a request via a state machine. We will now be able to
add a "waiting for disk cache" state to stop the request.
This adds a disk cache for HTTP responses received from the network. For
now, we take a rather conservative approach to caching. We don't cache a
response until we're 100% sure it is cacheable (there are heuristics we
can implement in the future based on the absence of specific headers).
The cache is broken into 2 categories of files:
1. An index file. This is a SQL database containing metadata about each
cache entry (URL, timestamps, etc.).
2. Cache files. Each cached response is in its own file. The file is an
amalgamation of all info needed to reconstruct an HTTP response. This
includes the status code, headers, body, etc.
A cache entry is created once we receive the headers for a response. The
index, however, is not updated at this point. We stream the body into
the cache entry as it is received. Once we've successfully cached the
entire body, we create an index entry in the database. If any of these
steps failed along the way, the cache entry is removed and the index is
left untouched.
Subsequent requests are checked for cache hits from the index. If a hit
is found, we read just enough of the cache entry to inform WebContent of
the status code and headers. The body of the response is piped to WC via
syscalls, such that the transfer happens entirely in the kernel; no need
to allocate the memory for the body in userspace (WC still allocates a
buffer to hold the data, of course). If an error occurs while piping the
body, we currently error out the request. There is a FIXME to switch to
a network request.
Cache hits are also validated for freshness before they are used. If a
response has expired, we remove it and its index entry, and proceed with
a network request.
